please stop playing stall
Comments
-
@OlderAngel11 you clearly have NO clue what you're talking about. it's like really really really really wild how confidently incorrect you are. the matchup is an auto loss unless the snorlax bricks. which it does not as the deck plays 50 trainers. ask any pro player and they'll say its a 95-5 mu. you're just one of those people that has to argue for no reason other than to argue. you clearly have zero experience on the matter, and if your experience shows the matchup is winnable, then you play against bots. period.
4 -
HA! That's funny. No, I have thoroughly tested the Zard v. Snorlax matchup and the Zard can still win. You are clearly biased to Snorlax because you lose to it so much, or maybe you're just playing Zard wrong, IDK. Don't get me wrong: There are absolutely situations where Zard will lose to Blocklax, and I wouldn't go as far as to say that it is a strong matchup for Zard, but if you play the cards right— something I'm going to assume you are not doing— then you can indeed win. I'd give the matchup at least a 40-60 in the Blocklax's favor. By no means is it 95-5, that's completely absurd.
5 -
The guy in Gdansk got bad luck, but the matchup will absolutely never be 99-1
5 -
Snorlax is the most boring deck ever. I think best of one gives people the illision snorlax is a good deck. Sure you have a strong defensive stategy that can win one game, but when you play at a regionals or beyond snorlax decks will be at a severe disadvantage for best of 3. That deck can never have a game 3 it's so slow to win with which is why I would never play it.
Real decks that take prize cards will finish their games like normal with no need to take 70+ turns.
I love pokemon still so who ever wants to play snorlax go ahead. I'm grateful to have a diverse metagame where there are a lot of viable options lol
2
