Armarogue took 0 damage from Cramorant, is that right?

Mint_T_0ne · February 11

I was playing Armarogue with rigid band and Cramorant did zero damage.

The 80 less damage of Armarogue is suppose to be after resistance so this seems wrong.

Armarogue -110 damage vs. Cramorant 110x2

Any thoughts? Is tcg live wrong? Should Cramorant have done 110 damage?

10types · February 11

Cramorant does not hit for weakness

MajorBrendan · February 11

That's not right.

clasingla · February 11

The opposing player could have skipped their attack that turn

Jammer87 · February 11

If Armorouge has a rigid band AND full health, it's right, as weakness isn't applied when using spit innocently. Otherwise, 30 damage or else...

OlderAngel11 · February 11

Are you sure the opponent attacked at all? he could've just passed and you thought he attacked. Of course this makes no sense but it's the best solution...

FloofCollects · February 11

prob a glitch

TechHog · February 11

https://community.pokemon.com/en-us/discussion/comment/28968#Comment_28968

It's not a glitch. Cramorant doesn't hit for weakness.

Now, why didn't they just make it Colorless in that case? Heck if I know.

OlderAngel11 · February 12

@TechHog But Cram should've still done 80 damage, right? Forgive me if I misunderstood, but I thought that Mint_T_One said that Armarouge had a rigid band, which means it takes thirty less since it is a stage one, meaning that cramorant does eighty. This is why I think the cram player might've passed.

TechHog · February 12

https://community.pokemon.com/en-us/discussion/comment/28980#Comment_28980

They're talking about Armarouge ex, which takes 80 less damage when at full HP.

OlderAngel11 · February 12

Ah, got it. Thx for the clarification.

Armarogue took 0 damage from Cramorant, is that right?

Best Answer

Answers

Categories