Pokémon shouldnt replace ash
They shouldn't replace ash because he has been in the anime for 27 years.
Comments
-
I agree. Once I work for the Pokémon company, I plan to bring him back to the anime sometime after gen 10.
0 -
Counterpoint: They should replace Ash because he has been in the anime for 27 years.
1 -
they should not replace ash as he is the first person you think of when someone says Pokemon besides pikachu.
0 -
To be honest, I think it's a good decision. Maybe not for marketing and that stuff, but not for writing or uniqueness.
I do think that Ash is cool, but friendly and dumb prodigy protagonists are a little boring. and some of the writers probably couldn't write the stories they actually wanted for a new game because they had to follow the formula Ash and the first few seasons set.
Plus, it gets repetitive seeing Ash being dumb and friendly and then challenging the league once he gets all badges or whatever he needs. As you said, he's been on a journey for 27 years for a single goal.
I'm really glad the writers finally have a little more freedom. There are so many ideas they can't use if Ash was still the main character.
(Small spoiler alert for Horizons since it's not in English yet)
Even though it's a bit tiring how Liko doesn't have a real goal yet, it's written pretty realistically, and her shy personality doesn't feel too forced. Roy's goal of being like the hero of legend he heard about as a kid and his search for (SPOILER) are pretty entertaining. And so far, all the characters work amazing together. Also, they made Roy and Ash have similar "very cheerful and slightly stupid" personalities but made them separate and unique with very different stories. That's pretty cool.
1