Welcome to the official Pokémon Forums!

Click here to review our official Rules & Guidelines.

Attackers should be punished

10 attackers with over 50 percent win

4 defenders, 4 supports and 2 all Rounders


How is balanced when roles mean nothing in this game. 3 even 4 attackees can easily win games now.


Why because attackers have range, even mobility in some cases, long cc that can stack in each other. Not to mention highest damage potential. What consequences exist for them?


Where is balance?

Comments

  • landiosswag
    landiosswag Member Posts: 22
    10 Comments Name Dropper Photogenic

    i think it's less of the attackers fault and more of the devs making it so that there are as many attackers as defenders and supporters COMBINED which is just poor game balance because it will mean that there will always be something overtuned in there i mean look at characters like duraludon and cramorant these are characters who used to be mandatory teammates if you wanted to win now they're the worst attackers in the whole game. the problem is that there are too many high damage dealers running around in a game where there are few characters who have any meaningful bulk being outnumbered by over 3:1 and half of them don't have the tools to use said bulk like crustle and mr. mime or still choose damage sets like sableye, trevenant, or greedant

  • airomem
    airomem Member Posts: 26
    10 Comments 5 Agrees Name Dropper

    There is no balance, they don't give AF hence why ranked MM is hot steaming garbage

  • issafaudi
    issafaudi Member Posts: 3
    First Comment

    A good team only needs 1 defender and 1 support so it makes since why there are more attackers when you need more of them in a match