Welcome to the official Pokémon Forums!

Click here to review our official Rules & Guidelines.
[Pokémon TCG Live] Maintenance Notice

The Pokémon TCG Live game client will be offline for maintenance from 15:00 ~ 23:00 (UTC) on June 17, 2025 while an update is being applied. Please see the Version 1.27.0 Patch Notes for more information on fixes and changes being made.

If you could change Any Pokémon’s national dex number who would you change

clasingla
clasingla Member Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭✭✭
2500 Comments 500 Likes 500 Agrees 50 Answers
edited June 15 in Pokémon Square #1

I would probably change the eeveelutions dex numbers so they’d all be next to each other in the dex (maybe also make Beheeyems dex number to 1000 because I love Beheeyem and it needs a more rememberable dex number instead of 606)

Comments

  • WildWorld1996
    WildWorld1996 Member Posts: 124 ✭✭✭
    100 Comments 25 Likes 5 Agrees 5 LOLs

    I might put Dipplin and Hydrapple next to each other. They're the only case of evolutionary relatives from the same generation that aren't next to each other in the Pokédex. Alternatively, I could put Walking Wake and Iron Leaves with the other Ancient Beasts and Iron Swords. Also, putting Landorus between Thundurus and Zekrom seems neat. That way, it would be Tornadus, Thundurus, Landorus, Reshiram, Zekrom, Kyurem, rather than Tornadus, Thundurus, Reshiram, Zekrom, Landorus, Kyurem. Also, for a more memorable national dex number for Beheeyem, why not 51? :P

  • TheJeffers
    TheJeffers Member Posts: 1,798 ✭✭✭✭✭
    500 Agrees 1000 Comments 50 Answers 250 Likes

    Honestly I would rearrange the whole national dex to group every Pokémon together with its later evolutions and baby forms.

    I think a lot of the Pokédex as a concept needs re-evaluating. Like the term "National Pokédex".

    When the Pokédex was first conceived, the only region that existed was Kanto, literally representing the real world Kanto Region in Japan.

    Subsequently, when they added Hoenn as a separate region (in what we may recognise now as essentially the first "Dexit"), though no longer bearing the name of its real world counterpart, it still represented a different region of Japan. Hence the terms "Regional Pokédex" and "National Pokédex". The nation in question is Japan, though it is not explicitly stated.

    From gen 5 onwards, when Pokémon began to set the games in "regions" based on other countries, they should have perhaps renamed the National Pokédex to the "International Pokédex". Or perhaps the "Global Pokédex".

    Unless they are implying that the Pokémon games all take place within one nation of culturally and geographically distinct regions. Is the Pokémon world a global empire. One global nation?

    Of course, the national dex is now largely irrelevant, anyway. You can no longer catch all Pokémon or register them all in one Pokédex in any of the modern games. They are all essentially limited to their own regional dex, each with their own numbering system, grouping and ordering. It is only relevant to Home, and if they could not get people to pay a subscription fee, I wonder how long they would even keep that around.

  • Eremas
    Eremas Member Posts: 1,689 ✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments 250 Likes 25 Answers 100 Agrees

    Rayquaza no 1!

  • Candy0_o
    Candy0_o Member Posts: 444 ✭✭✭
    100 Comments 25 Likes 25 Agrees 5 LOLs

    I feel like a pokemon like Arceus or Mew would be more fitting.