Welcome to the official Pokémon Forums!

Click here to review our official Rules & Guidelines.
[Pokémon TCG Live] Maintenance Notice

The Pokémon TCG Live game client will be offline for maintenance from 15:00 ~ 23:00 (UTC) on June 17, 2025 while an update is being applied. Please see the Version 1.27.0 Patch Notes for more information on fixes and changes being made.
The Pokémon Community Forums are evolving!

Your previous thread may temporarily be unavailable while we move discussions. We appreciate your patience!

Should Ash have been retired sooner?

D-ManBlue
D-ManBlue Member Posts: 383 ✭✭✭
100 Agrees 100 Comments 5 Answers 25 Likes
edited April 28 in Pokémon Square #1

As much as we like Ash, every character has limits when it comes to how long they can grow and stay relevant. Nowadays, we're finally saying goodbye to Ash as Liko and Roy take center stage.

Does anyone think they could have done the torch-passing sooner? I heard that they were originally going to replace him for the Black and White season, but they had no faith in the new main character.

Best Answers

  • CubsFan68
    CubsFan68 Member Posts: 5
    First Answer First Comment Photogenic
    #2 Answer ✓

    Yes, he should have been retired after DP and Hilda should have replaced him.

  • cobaltbuizel
    cobaltbuizel Member Posts: 11
    10 Comments 5 Agrees Name Dropper First Answer
    #3 Answer ✓

    Ash could've been retired at the end of XY, but now was probably the better time to do it.

Answers