Welcome to the official Pokémon Forums!

Click here to review our official Rules & Guidelines.
Important Notice for Pokémon Trainer Club Members:

The Pokémon Trainer Club services will be offline for maintenance from 15:00 ~ 16:00 (UTC) on April 23, 2025.
During this period, Pokémon Trainer Club logins and account creation will be unavailable.

Thank you for your patience at this time.

I think I'm gonna sit this meta out

2»

Comments

  • Eremas
    Eremas Member Posts: 1,601 ✭✭✭✭
    1000 Comments 250 Likes 25 Answers 100 Agrees
    #12

    the only solution is to lose games. Let go of the feeling you need to win at everything. It gets easier and you then get a new view of what the best decks are. You don't need the most popular thing.

  • Shadowbrine1
    Shadowbrine1 Member Posts: 283 ✭✭✭
    100 Comments 25 Agrees 25 Likes 5 Answers
    edited March 9 #13

    Sometimes the best decks in a tcg isn't the meta sometimes it's the deck the community makes - shadowbrine1

  • Blockinlick
    Blockinlick Member Posts: 91 ✭
    10 Comments 5 Likes 5 Agrees Name Dropper
    #14
    https://community.pokemon.com/en-us/discussion/comment/72390#Comment_72390

    The numbers are just my personal anecdotes.

    I bet being in different MMR ranges has different results.

  • Werenka1
    Werenka1 Member Posts: 61 ✭
    10 Comments First Answer 5 Agrees 5 Likes
    #15
    https://community.pokemon.com/en-us/discussion/comment/72580#Comment_72580

    If this game had any form if match making standard, i would agree, because thats the entire point of it… I have yet to see any form of match making standard outside of the “beginner” and “Trading Card Game Player” which has largely been accepted as meaningless.

    Do you have any evidence at all that supports the idea of this game using any form of match making standard?
    Because just earlier today I was paired against a lvl 11 player, running mid cards. Im lvl 41. No match making standard should allow that.

Categories