Welcome to the official Pokémon Forums!

Click here to review our official Rules & Guidelines.

Is there a time limit on choosing heads or tails

2

Answers

  • stephen9495
    stephen9495 Member Posts: 10
    5 Agrees Name Dropper 5 Likes First Answer

    Not sure what it's like in other ranks, but in Arceus it's being exploited. Repetitively taking advantage of a bug is not cool - people play ranked for practice for big tournaments. The people I mentioned were between 2750 and 3485. (in Arceus players only get 10 points for every win).

  • FelixDewott
    FelixDewott Member Posts: 32 ✭✭✭
    Second Anniversary 25 Likes 25 Agrees 10 Comments

    @JazzyUnicornGir Thanks, had no idea what was going on. Hope there'll be a fix soon!

  • ObviousDream
    ObviousDream Member Posts: 3
    5 Agrees First Comment

    @Thejeffers no they are 110 percent doing it on purpose or after the 20 mins has passed it wouldn't have told me my opponent conceded🤣🤣🙏 if it wasn't abuse than it should simply dc without wither party winning or losing, but when I get a winning screen after not touching my pc for 25 minutes Ik it was some Ahole who was trynna abuse the exploit, and the fact it's happening from the very first game I play right up until the final one I play b4 bed ya it's 110 percent abuse and if it wasn't than these ppl wouldn't be flying up through the ranks as fast

  • JazzyUnicornGir
    JazzyUnicornGir Member Posts: 189 ✭✭✭
    100 Comments 25 LOLs 25 Likes 25 Agrees

    FelixDewott Of course!

  • TheJeffers
    TheJeffers Member Posts: 2,143 ✭✭✭✭✭
    2,500 Likes 1,500 Agrees 500 LOLs 1000 Comments

    @ObviousDream

    How did you determine that this was a deliberate action on the part of your opponent, and not the result of the known bug present in the game right now?

    Because saying that the software did not act the way it normally does in the absence of the bug is not proof of anything.

    Again, it could be people exploiting the situation. Maybe a handful of them. Maybe all of them.

    But you have to have some pretty definitive evidence to declare "110% certainty".