Best Of
-
Re: That was pointless!
https://community.pokemon.com/en-us/discussion/comment/126027#Comment_126027 It can't be explained People were just talking about Pokémon1 -
Re: Dissapointed
Yup2 -
Re: Interactive Story
I don't have time tonight We need more votes, anyways1 -
Re: Guys they remembered Pokémon quest for Pokémon's 30th anniversary by referencing it multiple times
I prefer Pokemon Conquest1 -
Guys they remembered Pokémon quest for Pokémon's 30th anniversary by referencing it multiple times
It's on the Pokémon website, I have a stupid nostalgic love for that game. (It's almost ten years old) They also remember a lot of other forgotten Pokémon games.1 -
Re: Day Out Night Out
What if it’s, Pokémon forums but in REAL LIFE!?!??!??!!?! (I got this joke idea because it says connect with trainers and I’m pretty sure that’s what the forums are for)3 -
Re: That was pointless!
https://community.pokemon.com/en-us/discussion/comment/126034#Comment_126034 It was a superbowl ad for a PHOTOGRAPHY Feature!?!?!?!? In Pokémon go!?!?!3 -
Re: That was pointless!
The Superbowl is watched by normies. For normies, an ad saying "hey, Pokémon exists and celebrities like it" is enough to get their attention and get them thinking about the brand. You visi…7 -
Re: That was pointless!
https://community.pokemon.com/en-us/discussion/comment/126032#Comment_126032 I don't consider it an ad for Pokémon go even though Pokémon says it is, Pokémon go had nothing to do with the ad2 -
Re: That was pointless!
https://community.pokemon.com/en-us/discussion/comment/126026#Comment_126026 did you even read my first comment 2
