Pokemon on Nintendo Switch 2
Answers
-
@clasingla Is that really what you want? Just more content at any cost? Regardless of quality?
Pokémon Legends, BDSP and SV were all released with in the span of one year. Do you think that was a good thing? Do you think those were all high quality games? Should that be the paradigm Pokémon maintains going forward?
There is an old saying in business: You can have it fast, cheap or good. Choose two.
I suspect TPC have already chosen cheap for their development costs.
0 -
fast and good
and plus legends arceus and scarlet and violet were made by gamefreak and BDSP was made by ILCA i feel that to improve the quality of games they should stop trying to do so much for the mobile games i fell like we have enough mobile games of pokemon and they should stop releasing more mobile games and that can increase the quality and fast production of the games
0 -
@clasingla Gamefreak aren't as heavily involved in the mobile games, I believe. They tend to be made by external app developers. (That's why the quality is so much better XD) I don't think they affect the main series releases.
fast and good
Would you be okay with that if the costs were passed onto you? If Pokémon games were yearly releases, but cost $120 instead to pay for the extra staff and resources needed to push them out at high quality.
0 -
@clasingla Interesting. I wonder if others feel the same.
I think given the issues with the past few releases, most customers would be skeptical of the higher price point, to say the least. They'd really have to deliver something special.
0 -
Actually they're taking a break this year? Finally, we'll get better games (hopefully).
0 -
@UnovanZorua That is merely the beginning because it also means the Pokemon Company's beginning to slow down releases, and Pokemon Legends ZA is the beginning.
0
